Writers: J. Michael Strazynski & Joe Quesada
Artist: Joe Quesada
ONE MORE DAY is the definition of a story that gets worse and worse the more you think about it…
Rating: ⭐
Ever since I started reviewing comics, there has been one single book that I have shown more hatred and contempt for than any other... SPIDER-MAN: ONE MORE DAY…
For those who are unaware, SPIDER-MAN: ONE MORE DAY is widely regarded as one of the worst Spider-Man stories ever published, with the controversy surrounding it rivaling even that of THE CLONE SAGA (though having read the entirety of the saga myself for my CLONE MADNESS series, that story was CITIZEN KANE compared to this abomination). The story serves as the conclusion to J. Michael Straczynski’s (or JMS's) run on AMAZING SPIDER-MAN, where following the events of CIVIL WAR, Peter Parker has publicly revealed his secret identity to the entire world and is now a wanted fugitive on the run. In response, the Kingpin hired an assassin to eliminate Peter, but Aunt May was hit instead. The plot focuses on Peter desperately searching for a way to save May from dying, as he seeks help from various members of the superhero community, including Iron Man and Doctor Strange, who state that Aunt May is beyond saving. When all hope appears to be lost, Peter is suddenly approached by the Mephisto (who’s basically the Marvel Universe’s equivalent to the Devil), who claims to be the only can prevent May's death. Instead of offering to save May’s life in exchange for Peter’s soul, Mephisto instead desires to erase Peter and MJ’s marriage from existence. After spending one more day together, Peter and MJ agree to Mephisto’s terms, saving May’s life, and altering the time line (and basically the twenty years’ worth of Spider-Man comics) to where Peter and MJ never got married.
Mephisto wants Spider-Man's marriage. From Sensational Spider-Man #41 (Nov 2007). Art by Joe Quesada. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
This was a story that was immediately criticized by both fans and critics alike upon its initial release, and I myself have I’ve already written two reviews over this monstrosity. Despite that fact, I have been personally unsatisfied with both of my previous reviews, as I feel neither provide a coherent or satisfying analysis of the book’s problems. My very first review OMD (which was also the very first comic review I ever wrote) is one that I deeply regret making to this day, as I had not actually read the story back then, but just a plot summary of it on Wikipedia. As a critic, this was very unprofessional and inexcusable, as my arguments lacked credibility since I had no genuine evidence to back them up. A couple of years later, I rewrote my review of OMD after having read the story by then, and could provide legitimate criticisms. While my second review was not without merit, as it did address my biggest problems with the book, it also suffered from severe problems as I let my anger get the better of me while I was writing it. Therefore, the review came across as less of a mature and critical analysis, and more as a rant and tirade towards OMD and Joe Quesada, the former Editor-in-Chief of Marvel who spearheaded the project. However, since writing both reviews, I have gained much more experience as a critic, and feel that it is necessary for me correct my past mistakes. As such, I feel it is necessary for me to critique OMD one last time, and in a less biased and calmer manner.
Some people might think it's unnecessary for me to review this story for a third time, as both of my previous reviews clearly stated my main problems with the book: that I found the decision to erase Peter and Mary Jane’s marriage from continuity to be incredibly insulting to me as a Spider-Man fan as it regressed Peter’s character development, and was an editorial mandate enforced by Joe Quesada and Marvel Editorial, who deliberately ignored the wishes of the fans for their own selfish purposes. While it is true that those were my initial and only problems with OMD (and are still the biggest ones in my opinion), I felt obligated to reread the book when I recently read the entirety of JMS’s run on Spider-Man. After having read the book for a second time (as well as having watched Linkara’s review of it that he did for his 200th episode), I discovered that OMD has far more problems than I initially realized. On top of editorial greed, the retcon of Spider-Man’s marriage, and insulting of the intelligence of both Spider-Man fans and readers of comics and escapist fiction, OMD is also plagued by awful narrative structure, plot contrivances, and out-of-character behavior. Aside from redeeming my past mistakes, this is another major reason as to why I’m reviewing OMD again, as it’s the definition of a story that continuously gets worse the more you think about it. Basically, you fail to to notice most the book’s narrative flaws because you are distracted by the other problems that are more offensive on a personal level. As such, I’ll feel that should address all of OMD’s narrative failings before I discuss issues that personally offend me. I should also mention that none of my criticisms will be directed towards the book’s writer, JMS, as he has publicly stated that he did not want to write the comic in the first place, but that he was forced to by Marvel Editorial. In addition, JMS has also stated that he loved writing Peter and MJ as a married couple during his run on the book, and even threatened to take his name off the final issue of OMD in protest. As such, I hold no ill-will towards JMS and don’t blame him at all for his involvement in the book’s creation (plus, I really loved the rest his work on AMAZING SPIDER-MAN…), and will be associating the majority of OMD’s problems with Joe Quesada and Marvel Editorial, as they conceived the premise and have been incredibly biased towards Peter and MJ’s marriage since its inception back in the 1980s. With all that out of the way, it’s finally time to go into all the reasons why ONE MORE DAY is such a monumental failure of galactic proportions!
One of the less apparent, yet serious problems with ONE MORE DAY is that the plot is poorly structured and loaded with unnecessary filler. As I previously stated, the premise of the comic is that Peter and Mary Jane sacrifice their marriage to save Aunt May’s life by making a deal with the Devil. Because of this, one would think that the majority of the plot was focused on Peter and MJ, exploring the depth of their relationship and why they’re prepared to give it up to save Aunt May. Unfortunately, that is not the case as the deal with Mephisto ultimately doesn’t come in until more than halfway through the story. OMD is a four-issue story arc, and three of those four issues contribute nothing to the overall plot. This is particularly evident with the first two issues of the story, as they focus on Peter begging other superheroes to help save Aunt May, and they tell Peter that there’s nothing they can do before Peter leaves to find help from someone else. This is a major problem as both issues end exactly where they began, with May dying and Peter continuing to beg other superheroes for help. As such, neither chapters do anything advance the overall plot of the book, and provide nothing new to contribute, therefore coming across as unnecessary padding. Issue three commits similar sins by having most it dedicated to Peter coming across alternate versions of himself who are only there to point out the various ways in which Peter’s life could have gone in a different direction, and it’s only at the very end of this issue that Mephisto finally shows up and makes his offer. Essentially nearly three-fourths of OMD’s plot is completely wasted on Peter begging for help, as well as him meeting parallel versions of himself for no adequate purpose. Because of this, deal with Mephisto lacks sufficient build-up and comes completely out of left-field, as Quesada fails to provide insight into why Peter and MJ are willing to sacrifice their love and happiness for each other to save Aunt May, whose already an old woman likely to die of natural causes in the near future. Peter and MJ’s dilemma therefore lacks tension, as the reader is not given any emotional connection or reasoning as to why Peter is unwilling to let go of Aunt May, other than him constantly whining about how May’s death would be his fault due to publically unmasking. In my opinion, if OMD wanted to be an effective story about a couple giving up their love to save someone else, it should have focused its time on analyzing the importance of Peter’s relationship to Mary Jane, compare it with his relationship to Aunt May, explain what they each person means to him on an emotional level, and why he’s willing to let go of one in exchange for the other. This would not only have provided genuine emotional depth to the story, but also would've given better build-up and development to the erasing of the marriage. It wouldn’t necessarily have saved OMD as I still hate the premise, but would have made it feel less forced in my eyes. However, because the reader’s time is wasted by with unnecessary filler the central conflict of OMD lacks emotional weight and feels rushed and shoe-horned in at the last minute, making an already insulting premise even worse.
In relation to the poor narrative structure, OMD also relies heavily on illogical contrivances and inconsistencies in order to advance the plot. Basically, OMD falls into the category of an “idiot plot,” which to quote the late Roger Ebert, is “any plot containing problems that would be solved instantly if all the characters were not idiots.” All throughout OMD, each of the characters make stupid decisions for the plot to advance, while completely ignoring obvious and more logical solutions in front of them. This is most evident in the fact that apparently, no one in the Marvel Universe is capable saving Aunt May from a bullet wound in the chest. All throughout the story, Spider-Man visits various characters for assistance, such as Iron Man and Doctor Strange, and each of them state that they cannot help. This makes absolutely no sense as not only is the Marvel Universe home to gods, aliens, monsters, and technology far more advanced than that of the real-world, but it’s also inhabited by superheroes who have fixed much worse problems than a simple bullet wound. For instance, Doctor Strange is the Sorcerer Supreme, one of the most highly skilled magic users in the world, as well as a well-renowned surgeon. He should be perfectly capable of healing a simple bullet wound, but instead the writers have Strange idiotically reason that he can’t do it because of the damaged nerve endings in his hands. As Linkara perfectly stated in his review, Strange could easily get around this problem by creating magic hands to operate on May, or have him consult and advise other doctors performing the procedure. But instead, Quesada decides to ignore a fairly simple solution to the problem and make the situation ludicrously hopeless for no logical reason, which is further illustrated by Strange later sending multiple astral projections of Peter across the world to ask for aid from other superheroes and villains, including Mr. Fantastic, Beast of the X-Men, Black Panther, and Doctor Doom, and they too are incapable of helping.
Spider-Man desperately seeks help. From Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man #24 (Nov 2007). Art by Joe Quesada. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
Doctor Doom owes Spider-Man a debt. From Amazing Spider-Man #50 (Apr 2003). Art by John Romita Jr.. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
Silver Surfer heals a dying woman. From Silver Surfer #3 (Dec 1968). Art by John Buscema. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
Moria MacTaggert clones Charles Xavier's body. From Uncanny X-Men #167 (Mar 1983). Art by Paul Smith. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
The final flaw that I noticed upon rereading OMD was how heavily out-of-character Peter Parker was in the story, especially in comparison to the rest of JMS's run. Throughout the comic, Peter continuously whines and complains about how the whole situation is his fault, and refuses to simply accept May’s death. While I can understand being upset over a family member dying (as that’s perfectly natural), I am unable to sympathize with Peter as not only does his whining get really irritating very quickly, but it also doesn’t make sense from a character perspective. Peter says that he can’t accept May dying as she took the bullet intended for him, but that he would be fine if she were simply dying of natural causes.
Spider-Man whines about it being "all his fault." From Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man #24 (Nov 2007). Art by Joe Quesada. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
Aunt May shares Peter's guilt. From Amazing Spider-Man #38 (Feb 2002). Art by John Romita Jr.. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
Now that I’ve discussed ONE MORE DAY’s other problems, it’s finally time for me to elaborate on the elements about this comic that anger me on a personal level. Ever since the beginning, I’ve made it perfectly clear that my greatest problem with OMD was that it erased Peter Parker and Mary Jane’s marriage from existence. From a purely technical standpoint, OMD is basically a massive retcon, as it states that Peter and MJ never got married in previous issues, and will continue to remain unmarried in later issues. This offends me for a variety of reasons. To start off with, removing the marriage from Peter’s life removes one of the most important elements of the Spider-Man books: the character’s ability to relate to the reader. Joe Quesada has stated on numerous occasions that he disliked the marriage as it aged Peter’s character and made it difficult for teenagers to relate to him. I still find this reasoning to be complete bullcrap, as while yes, Peter was originally intended to appeal to a teenage audience (hence why he was still in high school when he first debuted), Quesada fails to understand that those teenage readers eventually grow up. Like Peter, they too get married, deal with financial concerns, have families, and lose loved ones. Essentially, having Spider-Man marry MJ allows him to grow up alongside the readers, therefore making him more relatable. By wiping the marriage from Peter’s history, Quesada is essentially removing the essence of what makes his character appealing. Another problem I have with the retcon from a personal standpoint is that I have been a huge fan of Peter and MJ as a married couple since I was a little kid. I’ve always found their relationship to be extremely compelling, as the two shared terrific chemistry, were both highly fleshed-out characters and had so many heart-warming moments together that just provided me a happy feeling whenever I read them. To see those beautiful moments taken away from me and then be told that they never happened is not only incredibly insulting, but also disappointing. This correlates with my next major problem, which is the fact that retconning the marriage essentially regresses Peter’s character development over the past twenty years. I went into great discussion over this in my previous review of OMD, so I’ll keep it brief here. Basically, I’ve always felt that the marriage further fleshed out Spider-Man as a character, as he felt more mature afterwards, having to deal with the complications of the adult world, and had a deeper and intimate relationship with MJ. The marriage also also widened the scope of his responsibilities, as he not only had obligations towards MJ as a husband, but also had to be more careful as Spider-Man. Since OMD is now saying that Peter never got married, his character has essentially been regressed to where he was before the marriage. As a fan of literature, undermining character development is inexcusable. The final major problem I have with Quesada retconning the marriage is that the idea of Peter and MJ would sell their marriage to the Devil doesn't make sense from a character perspective. Not only is May likely to soon die of natural causes, but Peter should not be putting his feelings for his aunt over those for his wife. As Linkara perfectly summarized in his review, “marriage raises the stakes in the relationship. It’s bigger than just that guy or girl [you’re] romantically affiliated with. You are saying that you want to spend the rest of your life with this person. They have become your family.” Therefore, Peter should not be willing to give up his love for MJ, as by marrying her, she has become his soul-mate, the person whom he should care about the most, which is further supported by AMAZING SPIDER-MAN (1999) #50 from JMS’s run. In that issue, Peter confessed to MJ that he's able to do what he does as Spider-Man because of her, that it’s her that gives him strength, that his life would be difficult without her, and that he needs her and not the other way around.
Peter needs Mary Jane. From Amazing Spider-Man #50 (Apr 2003). Art by John Romita Jr.. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
However, despite all my complaints about the horrible narrative structure, plot contrivances, out-of-character behavior, and even the retconning of the marriage, I believe that the biggest sin committed by ONE MORE DAY at the end of the day is the amount of editorial greed and cynicism surrounding the project. As I previously stated, the decision to undo Peter and MJ’s marriage was not a decision of the writer JMS, but rather an editorial mandate that was enforced upon him. Joe Quesada was a strong vocal opponent towards the marriage ever since its inception in the 1980s, and wanted to get rid of it from the Spider-Man books, even though there were a lot of fans who enjoyed the marriage, and JMS had been further developing Peter and MJ’s relationship during his seven-year run on the book. Essentially ONE MORE DAY was created because of the selfish interests of a single editor-in-chief, who willingly ignored the wishes of both the fans the then-current writer of Spider-Man, and enforced his own idea of what the story should be despite it going against the past twenty-years of Spider-Man’s history. This heavily angers me, as not only does it reinforce the terrible idea that editors should dictate a story’s direction rather than the actual writers, but it also shows a clear sign of contempt towards the audience as well. The layers of insult towards Spider-Man’s fanbase are clearly apparent in OMD, as by retconning the marriage and saying it never happened, Quesada is basically telling the fans, “say, you guys like Spidey being happily married? WELL SCREW YOU, YOU CAN’T HAVE IT! NOW READ WHAT I WANT YOU TO READ INSTEAD!” This is unforgivable in my eyes, as I feel comic book writers and publishers should owe a bit more respect to their readers, as they’re the source of the company’s profit, which is more likely to be gained when the customers are satisfied. By refusing to listen to the wishes of the readers, Quesada is not only insulting the audience’s intelligence, but also the very people who buy and pay money for the books Marvel creates. In addition, layers of contempt also seem to extend to comic book readers as a whole, and not just Spider-Man fans. This is particularly evident in a scene from the third issue of OMD, where Peter encounters an alternate version of himself in the form of an overweight video game designer that states, "You know why guys like me get into games like that? Because there's something missing... because things didn't plan out like they were supposed to. So we go someplace else.”
Earth-7161 Peter's speech about "Video Gammers." From Sensational Spider-Man #41 (Nov 2007). Art by Joe Quesada. Copyright © Marvel Entertainment. |
If you didn’t already notice, this speech is clearly meant to be a metaphor for comic book readers, saying that they only enjoy escapist fiction because they’re losers who are unsatisfied with their lives. That is, without a doubt, one of the most insulting statements towards comic book fans I have ever read in my entire life. Not only is it hypocritical for a comic book of all things to be criticizing people for enjoying escapist fiction (which comics are clearly a part of), but the sheer audacity that someone at Marvel would shame their customers by telling them, “You buy our crap because you're a loser, so keep buying our crap, loser!” is purely disgusting and offensive to me as a person who has been collecting and reading comics since the third grade! Even disregarding the deal with the Devil and the retcon of the marriage, the highly insulting statements made by ONE MORE DAY alone are deserving of all the hate and scorn this book has received.
After having analyzed and discussed every single one of the comic's numerous problems, I feel safe in my maintaining judgement of SPIDER-MAN: ONE MORE DAY as my hated comic book of all-time. While I freely acknowledge that other comics like Frank Miller’s HOLY TERROR, the entirety of Chuck Austen’s run on UNCANNY X-MEN, and even AVENGERS #200 are worse from an objective standpoint, I still hate OMD more as this is the only comic I have ever read that has managed to offend me personally. On top of retconning the marriage of Peter Parker and Mary Jane, ONE MORE DAY is not only plagued with terrible story structure and pacing, plot contrivances and continuity errors, out-of-character behavior concerning Peter, and editorial greed, but it also goes as far as to insult the intelligence of both Spider-Man fans and comic book readers in general. Never have I ever seen a comic with so much cynicism, contempt, and laziness surrounding it. It is the definition of a book that gets worse and worse the more you stop and think about it. Say what you will about THE CLONE SAGA, but it at least had genuine effort put into it, as the writers were trying to tell a good story that remained true to Peter Parker’s character and mythos despite the saga's narrative shortcomings. ONE MORE DAY on the other hand, shows not even the slightest attempt of effort, and serves as a colossal middle finger towards Spider-Man’s entire mythos and the people who read him. It is undeniably the worst Spider-Man comic ever created, and I can't possibly imagine someone coming up with a worse conceivable story for the wall crawler...
“Contempt for happiness is usually contempt for other people's happiness, and is an elegant disguise for hatred of the human race.”
-Bertrand Russell